Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 06:23

Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Retailers Seen Using Stablecoins to Push Back Against Card Fees - Bloomberg
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s going on with measles, bird flu, and COVID? Here’s a guide to the latest. - The Boston Globe
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Nintendo showcases Wave Race-style mission in Mario Kart World - My Nintendo News
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Don’t Miss This Rare Chance to See the Milky Way’s Glowing Core - SciTechDaily
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Galaxy Watch could automatically lock your phone when it's left behind - SamMobile
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Hello I am 17 year old boy and I am interested in transgender why?
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?